After a
shocking Hungarian GP before the summer break, Lewis Hamilton bounced back to
dominate the Belgian GP. It had looked as though team mate Nico Rosberg was
going to be the man to beat during the weekend, until Saturday morning practise
where Hamilton found his groove. He showed his dominance by gaining a half
second gap to team mate Rosberg in qualifying thanks to two utterly fantastic
laps. From then, Hamilton never looked back and had the race under control from
start to finish. Although Hamilton and Rosberg are in identical machinery,
Hamilton's sheer dominance over Rosberg leaves a feeling that the final run in
for the title may be a procession. Rosberg has been very open about his team
mates superiority, which is slightly unnerving. We have seen over the course of
the season that Rosberg can challenge Hamilton on the track, but something
seemed to be different over the Spa weekend. Hamilton was in a different race
to his team mate and, of course, the rest of the field. Rosberg's pursuit of
Hamilton near the end of the race where he was closing in was only due to
Hamilton easing off under the instructions of the team. Rosberg has to go away
and have a think about how he can beat Hamilton, and actually believe he can
beat, him or the title race will be over sooner rather than later.
Pirelli Forces to Defend Tyres
Two huge
190mph tyre blowouts for Nico Rosberg and Sebastian Vettel over the weekend
have forced Pirelli to come out and defend their tyres, not for the first time
during their spell in F1. During practise, Rosberg's tyre blew spectacularly
and he somehow managed to keep it out of the wall. Worryingly, onboard camera
shots show Rosberg's tyre starting to tear away near the beginning of the lap,
not blowing until near the end. Vettel's tyre blew right near the end of the
race where a podium could have been on the cards for the Ferrari driver. This
led Vettel to deliver a damning verdict on the tyre supplier. As usual however,
Pirelli's attempt to come out and explain themselves hasn't done them any
favours. Even if Pirelli are right in what they say, they simply won't win the
argument. Pirelli's motorsport director, Paul Hembery, came out and said that
they had issued a pre-race warning to the teams indicating that the anticipated
life on the medium tyres would be 40 laps, almost the entire race distance. The
problem for Pirelli here is that Vettel's medium tyre blew after just 28 laps.
Pirelli then issued a press release on the Sunday night stating that in 2013,
they had sought it impose a lap limit for their tyres that would have
restricted a single stint to 50% of a full race distance. The fact that Pirelli
are looking back to the last time nude blowouts were occurring for their excuse
is sure to put more scrutiny on the Italian company, who insist they want to
stay in F1. After this latest series of blowouts, surely the teams will have
concerns heading into the Italian GP where the high speed straights and corners
may have a huge effect on tyres once again.
Grosjean Lifts Debt Crippled Lotus
Over the
weekend, rumours were circulating that the Lotus F1 cars were to be impounded
as the Enstone team's financial problems hit critical point. Even with Pastor
Maldonado's Venezuelan oil backing the team, things are really bad at the team.
So, for Romain Grosjean to score his and the teams first podium since the
American GP in 2013 was something special. The fact the place was secured after
Vettel's tyre failure is irrelevant, as Grosjean was nailed on to claim third
even after his five place grid penalty. Grosjean was fantastic all race and was
constantly there, or thereabouts, all race. It was fitting his podium came at
Spa, as this was the track in 2012 where the Frenchman earned himself a race
ban after causing a first lap pile up, which also led to Mark Webber labelling
him as a "first lap nutcase".
Red Bull and Renault Finally Set for Divorce?
Rumours
have been circulating that Red Bull are looking for a different engine supplier
for 2016, and frankly, who could blame them? The partnership that delivered
four consecutive World Championships has quickly went south, with both sides
blaming the other for the poor season that Red Bull have had. Mercedes seemed
to warm to the idea of supplying engines to Red Bull, with the stipulation that
it wouldn't disrupt any agreement already in place, then Red Bull say they want
an early exit from their contract. Coincidence?
The
situation that Red Bull find themselves in deserves some sympathy. All season,
Red Bull's goal has been to fire up Renault to get them to progress and commit
for 2016. What Red Bull don't want is a 2016 season where they are bashing
their heads against a wall again. Christian Horner has said he wants to hear
what Renault’s plans entail for the future, and has said they will go from
there. The spat has not been kept in house at either Red Bull or Renault which
has, in my opinion, damaged both outfit’s reputations. Ultimately, Red Bull's
frustration boils down to the fact that F1 is now very engine critical. The
first victim of this realisation is Red Bull's previous firm stance that they
could win in any given race and season through chassis design alone.
Unfortunately for them, F1 is all about engine power now, not chassis
design.
No comments:
Post a Comment